ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • HDFC Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE FUNDArbitrage×
  • Nippon India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherHDFC ArbitrageADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGENippon India ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
HDFC Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 52% of their portfolios
HDFC Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
HDFC Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGEArbitrage
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and HDFC Arbitrage share 52% of their portfolios
itself
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and Nippon India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 50% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE share 51% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 50% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: HDFC Arbitrage Fund and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE FUND share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureHDFC ArbitrageADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGENippon India ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedAditya Birla Sun Life AMC LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P428% of 109100% of 109100% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.53% points0.68% points0.70% points0.60% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1117%86%118%128%
Run by P7not knownKrina Mehta · ≥ 6 moRohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrsNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs
1-year return6.7%6.8%6.8%6.7%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.5%7.3%7.3%
5 years p.a.6.7%6.8%6.8%6.7%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.5%−0.4%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹25,229 Cr₹26,997 Cr₹16,560 Cr₹34,536 Cr
Disclosed history2.4 yrs8.3 yrs14 yrs10 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight191 · 39%208 · 35%184 · 45%205 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.