ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • HDFC Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Nippon India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherHDFC ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageNippon India ArbitrageKotak Arbitrage
HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
HDFC Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios
HDFC Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
HDFC Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios
itself
SBI Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself

Closest pair: HDFC Arbitrage Fund and SBI Arbitrage Fund share 57% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureHDFC ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageNippon India ArbitrageKotak Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P428% of 10938% of 109100% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.53% pointsnot measured0.70% points0.58% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1117%98%118%not measured
Run by P7not knownArdhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 moRohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrsnot known
1-year return6.7%6.5%6.8%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.3%7.3%7.5%
5 years p.a.6.7%6.9%6.8%6.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.5%−0.4%−0.5%
Assets (AUM)₹25,229 Cr₹38,447 Cr₹16,560 Cr₹70,955 Cr
Disclosed history2.4 yrs5.8 yrs14 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight191 · 39%208 · 41%184 · 45%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.