ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • Mirae Asset Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India Large CapKotak Mid CapNippon India ValueMirae Asset Large Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India ValueValue
Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 59% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 59% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India Large CapKotak Mid CapNippon India ValueMirae Asset Large Cap
CategoryLarge CapMid CapValueLarge Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedMirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P473% of 10983% of 10993% of 10964% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.01% points1.44% points0.82% points1.06% points
Portfolio turned over a year P157%not measured82%53%
Run by P7Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsnot knownMeenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsGaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs
1-year return−4.7%4.8%−2.8%−3.3%
3 years p.a.11.1%18.1%14.0%8.6%
5 years p.a.12.8%16.8%13.4%7.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−15.4%−20.9%−17.6%−15.8%
Assets (AUM)₹52,344 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹8,875 Cr₹38,599 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs—12 yrs5.1 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight69 · 45%none disclosed94 · 36%76 · 48%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.