Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Large Cap share 52% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Value | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 83% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.01% points | 0.83% points | 1.44% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 57% | 58% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −4.7% | −5.4% | 4.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.1% | 11.5% | 18.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 13.5% | 16.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.4% | −14.0% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 13 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 69 · 45% | 66 · 52% | none disclosed |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.