Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Large Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Large Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Canara Robeco Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 30% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios |
| UTI - Flexi Cap Fund.Flexi Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Nippon India Large Cap share 30% of their portfolios | itself | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 37% of their portfolios |
| Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap | Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios | Canara Robeco Large Cap and UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. share 37% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund share 63% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Large Cap | UTI - Flexi Cap Fund. | Canara Robeco Large Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Large Cap | Flexi Cap | Large Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 73% of 109 | 40% of 109 | 72% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.01% points | 0.68% points | 1.38% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 57% | 41% | 40% |
| Run by P7 | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Ajay Tyagi · 11 yrs | Shridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | −4.7% | −2.3% | −4.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.1% | 8.4% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 12.8% | 4.9% | 9.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −15.4% | −20.1% | −14.8% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹23,434 Cr | ₹17,092 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 69 · 45% | 62 · 44% | 63 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.