Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| KOTAK GOLD ETF | ICICI Prudential Gold ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| KOTAK GOLD ETF | itself | 0% |
| ICICI Prudential Gold ETF | 0% | itself |
Most alike: KOTAK GOLD ETF and ICICI Prudential Gold ETF share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | KOTAK GOLD ETF | ICICI Prudential Gold ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Gold ETF | Gold ETF |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 34% of 109 | 8% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Gaurav Chikane · 5.1 yrs |
| 1-year return | 35.6% | 35.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 35.9% | 36.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 26.1% | 26.2% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −22.3% | −22.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹14,430 Cr | ₹18,949 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 7.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | — · — | 3 · 100% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.