Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Small Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | DSP Small Cap | HSBC Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSP Small CapSmall Cap | itself | DSP Small Cap and HSBC Value share 5% of their portfolios | DSP Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 0% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and DSP Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and DSP Small Cap share 0% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and HSBC Value share 27% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HSBC Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 27% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | DSP Small Cap | HSBC Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Small Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 22% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.92% points | 1.12% points | 0.83% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 48% | 75% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | 17.8% | 2.4% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.3% | 15.9% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.1% | — | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −24.1% | −19.6% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹21,018 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 86 · 39% | 86 · 32% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.