ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Tata Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Nippon India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak ArbitrageTata ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
Kotak Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Tata ArbitrageArbitrage
Tata Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
Tata Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Tata Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
itself
SBI Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: SBI Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak ArbitrageTata ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Tata Asset Management LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 109100% of 5838% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.58% points0.82% pointsnot measured0.70% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured263%98%118%
Run by P7not knownSailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrsArdhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 moRohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrs
1-year return6.8%6.8%6.5%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.5%7.5%7.3%7.3%
5 years p.a.6.9%6.9%6.9%6.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.4%−0.5%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹70,955 Cr₹24,426 Cr₹38,447 Cr₹16,560 Cr
Disclosed history—1.3 yrs5.8 yrs14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed212 · 52%208 · 41%184 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.