ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Tata Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageTata ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
Kotak Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
SBI Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
Tata ArbitrageArbitrage
Tata Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Tata Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
itself
Tata Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: SBI Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak ArbitrageSBI ArbitrageTata ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management LimitedTata Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 10938% of 109100% of 58100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.58% pointsnot measured0.82% points0.60% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured98%263%128%
Run by P7not knownArdhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 moSailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrsNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs
1-year return6.8%6.5%6.8%6.7%
3 years p.a.7.5%7.3%7.5%7.3%
5 years p.a.6.9%6.9%6.9%6.7%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.5%−0.4%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹70,955 Cr₹38,447 Cr₹24,426 Cr₹34,536 Cr
Disclosed history—5.8 yrs1.3 yrs10 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed208 · 41%212 · 52%205 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.