Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Mid Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 10% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Mid Cap Fund and Bandhan Value Fund share 10% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Mid Cap | Kotak Multi Cap | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Value |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 66% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.92% points | 1.62% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 38% | not measured | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | 4.2% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.6% | 17.3% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.9% | — | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −21.0% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | — | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 81 · 37% | none disclosed | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.