Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Mid Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself | BANDHAN Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, HDFC Mid Cap Fund and BANDHAN Small Cap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Mid Cap | BANDHAN Small Cap | Kotak Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 66% of 109 | 75% of 44 | 83% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.92% points | 2.00% points | 1.44% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 38% | 68% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Kirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | 10.4% | 4.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.6% | 25.3% | 18.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.9% | 20.0% | 16.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −22.8% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹31,103 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 4.3 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 81 · 37% | 265 · 30% | none disclosed |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.