ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • HDFC Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Nippon India Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherHDFC Mid CapNippon India Small CapKotak Multi CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap
HDFC Mid CapMid Cap
itself
HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios
HDFC Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Small Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 16% of their portfolios
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and HDFC Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 16% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself

Closest pair: HDFC Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureHDFC Mid CapNippon India Small CapKotak Multi CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapSmall CapMulti CapMid Cap
Fund houseHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P466% of 10990% of 109100% of 2487% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.92% points1.10% points1.62% points0.86% points
Portfolio turned over a year P138%68%not measured52%
Run by P7not knownSamir Rachh · 9.6 yrsnot knownRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs
1-year return6.6%8.9%4.2%7.0%
3 years p.a.17.6%16.1%17.3%18.6%
5 years p.a.18.9%19.0%—18.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−16.8%−24.2%−21.0%−19.9%
Assets (AUM)₹1.07 lakh Cr₹76,236 Cr₹25,937 Cr₹48,143 Cr
Disclosed history10 mo14 yrs—14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight81 · 37%257 · 16%none disclosed105 · 25%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.