Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | HDFC Mid Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap share 11% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Large CapLarge Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 14% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and HDFC Mid Cap share 31% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap share 14% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HDFC Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | HDFC Mid Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Large Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 66% of 109 | 52% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.92% points | 0.87% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 38% | 53% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Harish Krishnan · ≥ 6 mo | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 6.6% | −4.2% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 17.6% | 9.5% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 18.9% | 8.9% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.8% | −16.7% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹29,521 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 10 mo | 1.3 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 81 · 37% | 77 · 43% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.