ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Invesco India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • HDFC Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherInvesco India ArbitrageHDFC ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
Invesco India ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
Invesco India Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 52% of their portfolios
Invesco India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Invesco India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage
HDFC Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 52% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
HDFC Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
Kotak Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself

Closest pair: Invesco India Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share 54% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureInvesco India ArbitrageHDFC ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageICICI Prudential Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseInvesco Asset Management (India) Private LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P493% of 10928% of 109100% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.66% points0.53% points0.58% points0.60% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1233%117%not measured128%
Run by P7Deepak Gupta · ≥ 1 monot knownnot knownNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrs
1-year return6.9%6.7%6.8%6.7%
3 years p.a.7.5%7.3%7.5%7.3%
5 years p.a.7.1%6.7%6.9%6.7%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.4%−0.5%−0.5%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹24,108 Cr₹25,229 Cr₹70,955 Cr₹34,536 Cr
Disclosed history11 yrs2.4 yrs—10 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight582 · 113%191 · 39%none disclosed205 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.