ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Invesco India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Tata Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Nippon India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherInvesco India ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageTata ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
Invesco India ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
Invesco India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Invesco India Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Invesco India Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share 47% of their portfolios
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
Kotak Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Tata ArbitrageArbitrage
Tata Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Tata Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
Tata Arbitrage and Nippon India Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
Nippon India ArbitrageArbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 47% of their portfolios
Nippon India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Nippon India Arbitrage and Tata Arbitrage share -0% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Invesco India Arbitrage Fund and Nippon India Arbitrage Fund share 47% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureInvesco India ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageTata ArbitrageNippon India Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseInvesco Asset Management (India) Private LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Tata Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P493% of 109100% of 109100% of 58100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.66% points0.58% points0.82% points0.70% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1233%not measured263%118%
Run by P7Deepak Gupta · ≥ 1 monot knownSailesh Jain · ≥ 1.3 yrsRohit Hashmukh Shah · 2.3 yrs
1-year return6.9%6.8%6.8%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.5%7.5%7.5%7.3%
5 years p.a.7.1%6.9%6.9%6.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.4%−0.5%−0.4%−0.4%
Assets (AUM)₹24,108 Cr₹70,955 Cr₹24,426 Cr₹16,560 Cr
Disclosed history11 yrs—1.3 yrs14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight582 · 113%none disclosed212 · 52%184 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.