Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Invesco India Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | |
|---|---|---|
| Invesco India Mid Cap | itself | 25% |
| Nippon India Growth Mid Cap | 25% | itself |
Most alike: Invesco India Mid Cap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 25% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Invesco India Mid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Mid Cap |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 82% of 109 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.78% | 0.86% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 73% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Aditya Khemani · ≥ 1 mo | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 9.4% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 24.3% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 19.8% | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.1% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹14,372 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 11 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 43 · 50% | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.