Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI Liquid | Nippon India Small Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI LiquidUncategorised | itself | SBI Liquid and Nippon India Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for SBI Liquid | SBI Liquid and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for SBI Liquid |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and SBI Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for SBI Liquid | itself | Nippon India Small Cap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 6% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and SBI Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for SBI Liquid | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 6% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Nippon India Small Cap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund, share 6%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
SBI Liquid has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI Liquid | Nippon India Small Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Uncategorised | Small Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 90% of 109 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 1.10% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 68% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | 0.0% | 8.9% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 0.0% | 16.1% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | 19.0% | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −24.2% | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 14 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 257 · 16% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.