ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI SMALL CAP FUNDSmall Cap×
  • BANDHAN Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak Mid CapSBI SMALL CAPBANDHAN Small CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI SMALL CAPSmall Cap
SBI SMALL CAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
SBI SMALL CAP and BANDHAN Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI SMALL CAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios
BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap
BANDHAN Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
BANDHAN Small Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios
itself
BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI SMALL CAP share 4% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: BANDHAN Small Cap Fund and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 10% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak Mid CapSBI SMALL CAPBANDHAN Small CapNippon India Growth Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapSmall CapSmall CapMid Cap
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P483% of 10949% of 10975% of 4487% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.44% points1.31% points2.00% points0.86% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured54%68%52%
Run by P7not knownR Srinivasan · ≥ 3 moKirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs
1-year return4.8%6.6%10.4%7.0%
3 years p.a.18.1%12.3%25.3%18.6%
5 years p.a.16.8%14.2%20.0%18.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−22.4%−22.8%−19.9%
Assets (AUM)₹64,136 Cr₹39,942 Cr₹31,103 Cr₹48,143 Cr
Disclosed history—5.8 yrs4.3 yrs14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed73 · 37%265 · 30%105 · 25%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.