ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Canara Robeco Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Axis Midcap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak Mid CapCanara Robeco Large CapNippon India Large CapAxis Midcap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Canara Robeco Large CapLarge Cap
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
Canara Robeco Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 18% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 63% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios
Axis MidcapMid Cap
Axis Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Axis Midcap and Canara Robeco Large Cap share 18% of their portfolios
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Canara Robeco Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 63% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak Mid CapCanara Robeco Large CapNippon India Large CapAxis Midcap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapLarge CapMid Cap
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Canara Robeco Asset Management Company LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P483% of 10972% of 10973% of 10944% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.44% points1.38% points1.01% points1.36% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured40%57%80%
Run by P7not knownShridatta Bhandwaldar · ≥ 1.1 yrsSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsnot known
1-year return4.8%−4.0%−4.7%6.9%
3 years p.a.18.1%10.4%11.1%17.1%
5 years p.a.16.8%9.0%12.8%13.5%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−14.8%−15.4%−19.5%
Assets (AUM)₹64,136 Cr₹17,092 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹32,454 Cr
Disclosed history—4.8 yrs13 yrs5.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed63 · 47%69 · 45%91 · 30%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.