ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×
  • Axis Midcap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak Mid CapNippon India Large CapNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Midcap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Midcap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 19% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and Axis Midcap share 13% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 19% of their portfolios
itself
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Axis Midcap share 42% of their portfolios
Axis MidcapMid Cap
Axis Midcap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Large Cap share 13% of their portfolios
Axis Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 42% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund and Axis Midcap Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak Mid CapNippon India Large CapNippon India Growth Mid CapAxis Midcap
CategoryMid CapLarge CapMid CapMid Cap
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Nippon Life India Asset Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedAxis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P483% of 10973% of 10987% of 10944% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.44% points1.01% points0.86% points1.36% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured57%52%80%
Run by P7not knownSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrsnot known
1-year return4.8%−4.7%7.0%6.9%
3 years p.a.18.1%11.1%18.6%17.1%
5 years p.a.16.8%12.8%18.0%13.5%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−15.4%−19.9%−19.5%
Assets (AUM)₹64,136 Cr₹52,344 Cr₹48,143 Cr₹32,454 Cr
Disclosed history—13 yrs14 yrs5.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed69 · 45%105 · 25%91 · 30%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.