Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value | HSBC Value | SBI MIDCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and HSBC Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios |
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and HSBC Value share 8% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and HSBC Value Fund share 28% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value | HSBC Value | SBI MIDCAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | SBI Funds Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 83% of 109 | 93% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 38% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.44% points | 0.82% points | 1.12% points | 1.09% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 82% | 75% | 80% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 4.8% | −2.8% | 2.4% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.1% | 14.0% | 15.9% | 11.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.8% | 13.4% | — | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −17.6% | −19.6% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹24,349 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 12 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 94 · 36% | 86 · 32% | 64 · 28% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.