ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI MIDCAP FUNDMid Cap×
  • SBI Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Nippon India Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherKotak Mid CapSBI MIDCAPSBI Large CapNippon India Large Cap
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and SBI Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI MIDCAPMid Cap
SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
SBI MIDCAP and SBI Large Cap share 12% of their portfolios
SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Large Cap share 4% of their portfolios
SBI Large CapLarge Cap
SBI Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
SBI Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 12% of their portfolios
itself
SBI Large Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 51% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Large Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 4% of their portfolios
Nippon India Large Cap and SBI Large Cap share 51% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: SBI Large Cap Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 51% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureKotak Mid CapSBI MIDCAPSBI Large CapNippon India Large Cap
CategoryMid CapMid CapLarge CapLarge Cap
Fund houseKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management LimitedSBI Funds Management LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P483% of 10938% of 10945% of 10973% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.44% points1.09% points0.93% points1.01% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured80%59%57%
Run by P7not knownBhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 moSaurabh Pant · ≥ 3 moSailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs
1-year return4.8%3.8%−1.6%−4.7%
3 years p.a.18.1%11.0%9.2%11.1%
5 years p.a.16.8%13.5%9.0%12.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−20.9%−17.9%−15.4%−15.4%
Assets (AUM)₹64,136 Cr₹24,349 Cr₹55,417 Cr₹52,344 Cr
Disclosed history—5.8 yrs5.8 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed64 · 28%57 · 47%69 · 45%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.