Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Kotak Mid Cap | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and Quant Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| Quant Small CapSmall Cap | Quant Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 5% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value and Quant Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, Quant Small Cap Fund and Nippon India Value Fund, share 5%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Kotak Mid Cap | Quant Small Cap | Nippon India Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Small Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | quant Money Managers Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 83% of 109 | 69% of 109 | 93% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.44% points | 0.84% points | 0.82% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 75% | 82% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Ankit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs |
| 1-year return | 4.8% | 12.7% | −2.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 18.1% | 18.5% | 14.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 16.8% | 19.2% | 13.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −20.9% | −24.4% | −17.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹34,069 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 7.5 yrs | 12 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 120 · 43% | 94 · 36% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.