Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage | Edelweiss Balanced Advantage | |
|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage | itself | 0% |
| Edelweiss Balanced Advantage | 0% | itself |
Most alike: ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage Fund and Edelweiss Balanced Advantage Fund share 0% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | ICICI Prudential Balanced Advantage | Edelweiss Balanced Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage | Dynamic Asset Allocation or Balanced Advantage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 86% of 109 | 70% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.93% | 1.25% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 42% | not measured |
| Run by P7 | Manish Banthia · 17 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.3% | 10.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 10.7% | 9.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −8.2% | −11.1% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹75,356 Cr | ₹12,896 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | — |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 239 · 35% | — · — |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.