ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • HDFC Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×
  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherICICI Prudential ArbitrageHDFC ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageSBI Arbitrage
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
HDFC ArbitrageArbitrage
HDFC Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 51% of their portfolios
itself
HDFC Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
HDFC Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself
Kotak Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and HDFC Arbitrage share 57% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself

Closest pair: HDFC Arbitrage Fund and SBI Arbitrage Fund share 57% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureICICI Prudential ArbitrageHDFC ArbitrageKotak ArbitrageSBI Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedHDFC Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.SBI Funds Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4100% of 10928% of 109100% of 10938% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.60% points0.53% points0.58% pointsnot measured
Portfolio turned over a year P1128%117%not measured98%
Run by P7Nikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrsnot knownnot knownArdhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 mo
1-year return6.7%6.7%6.8%6.5%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.3%7.5%7.3%
5 years p.a.6.7%6.7%6.9%6.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.4%−0.5%−0.5%−0.5%
Assets (AUM)₹34,536 Cr₹25,229 Cr₹70,955 Cr₹38,447 Cr
Disclosed history10 yrs2.4 yrs—5.8 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight205 · 41%191 · 39%none disclosed208 · 41%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.