ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • DSP Midcap FundMid Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×
  • Bandhan Value FundValue×
  • Nippon India Growth Mid Cap FundMid Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherDSP MidcapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Bandhan ValueNippon India Growth Mid Cap
DSP MidcapMid Cap
itself
DSP Midcap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 6% of their portfolios
DSP Midcap and Bandhan Value share 6% of their portfolios
DSP Midcap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 36% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and DSP Midcap share 6% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 5% of their portfolios
Bandhan ValueValue
Bandhan Value and DSP Midcap share 6% of their portfolios
Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios
itself
Bandhan Value and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and DSP Midcap share 36% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 5% of their portfolios
Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Bandhan Value share 9% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureDSP MidcapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Bandhan ValueNippon India Growth Mid Cap
CategoryMid CapValueValueMid Cap
Fund houseDSP Asset Managers Private LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedNippon Life India Asset Management Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P443% of 10968% of 10967% of 10987% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P51.02% points0.83% points1.17% points0.86% points
Portfolio turned over a year P156%58%68%52%
Run by P7Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrsDharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrsDaylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrsRupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs
1-year return3.6%−5.4%−1.1%7.0%
3 years p.a.14.6%11.5%10.4%18.6%
5 years p.a.11.8%13.5%12.8%18.0%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−21.2%−14.0%−17.9%−19.9%
Assets (AUM)₹20,871 Cr₹60,800 Cr₹10,051 Cr₹48,143 Cr
Disclosed history13 yrs13 yrs4.9 yrs14 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight66 · 30%66 · 52%68 · 47%105 · 25%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.