Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | DSP Midcap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSP MidcapMid Cap | itself | DSP Midcap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 25% of their portfolios | DSP Midcap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 22% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Multi CapMulti Cap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and DSP Midcap share 25% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 14% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and DSP Midcap share 22% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap share 14% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: DSP Midcap Fund and ICICI Prudential Multi Cap Fund share 25% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | DSP Midcap | ICICI Prudential Multi Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | DSP Asset Managers Private Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 43% of 109 | 49% of 109 | 54% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.02% points | 1.03% points | 1.37% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 56% | 108% | 92% |
| Run by P7 | Vinit Sambre · ≥ 1.2 yrs | Lalit Kumar · 1.1 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.6% | 6.8% | −0.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.6% | 15.9% | 19.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.8% | 15.0% | 21.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −21.2% | −17.3% | −28.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹20,871 Cr | ₹19,305 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 13 yrs | 11 yrs | 4.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 66 · 30% | 167 · 24% | 32 · 54% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.