ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • SBI Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Invesco India Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • ICICI Prudential Arbitrage FundArbitrage×
  • Kotak Arbitrage FundArbitrage · no portfolio disclosed×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherSBI ArbitrageInvesco India ArbitrageICICI Prudential ArbitrageKotak Arbitrage
SBI ArbitrageArbitrage
itself
SBI Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 53% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
SBI Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Invesco India ArbitrageArbitrage
Invesco India Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 53% of their portfolios
itself
Invesco India Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
Invesco India Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
ICICI Prudential ArbitrageArbitrage
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage share 56% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage share 54% of their portfolios
itself
ICICI Prudential Arbitrage and Kotak Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak ArbitrageArbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and SBI Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and Invesco India Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
Kotak Arbitrage and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Arbitrage
itself

Closest pair: SBI Arbitrage Fund and ICICI Prudential Arbitrage Fund share 56% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Arbitrage has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureSBI ArbitrageInvesco India ArbitrageICICI Prudential ArbitrageKotak Arbitrage
CategoryArbitrageArbitrageArbitrageArbitrage
Fund houseSBI Funds Management LimitedInvesco Asset Management (India) Private LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P438% of 10993% of 109100% of 109100% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measured0.66% points0.60% points0.58% points
Portfolio turned over a year P198%233%128%not measured
Run by P7Ardhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 moDeepak Gupta · ≥ 1 moNikhil Kabra · 5.8 yrsnot known
1-year return6.5%6.9%6.7%6.8%
3 years p.a.7.3%7.5%7.3%7.5%
5 years p.a.6.9%7.1%6.7%6.9%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−0.5%−0.4%−0.4%−0.5%
Assets (AUM)₹38,447 Cr₹24,108 Cr₹34,536 Cr₹70,955 Cr
Disclosed history5.8 yrs11 yrs10 yrs—
Holdings · top ten weight208 · 41%582 · 113%205 · 41%none disclosed

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.