Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Liquid fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Taurus Liquid | ICICI Prudential Liquid | Axis Liquid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taurus LiquidLiquid | itself | Taurus Liquid and ICICI Prudential Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for Taurus Liquid | Taurus Liquid and Axis Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for Taurus Liquid |
| ICICI Prudential LiquidLiquid | ICICI Prudential Liquid and Taurus Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for Taurus Liquid | itself | ICICI Prudential Liquid and Axis Liquid share 20% of their portfolios |
| Axis LiquidLiquid | Axis Liquid and Taurus Liquid: no portfolio disclosed for Taurus Liquid | Axis Liquid and ICICI Prudential Liquid share 20% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Liquid Fund and Axis Liquid Fund share 20% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Taurus Liquid has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Taurus Liquid | ICICI Prudential Liquid | Axis Liquid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Liquid | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fund house | Taurus Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 39 | 59% of 109 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.09% points | 0.08% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | not measured | not measured |
| Run by P7 | not known | Darshil Dedhia · 3.3 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | 5.5% | 6.5% | 6.6% |
| 3 years p.a. | 5.4% | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 4.8% | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | −0.0% | −0.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹0 Cr | ₹65,311 Cr | ₹55,968 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 6.3 yrs | 5.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 173 · 23% | 137 · 30% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.