Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| UTI - Arbitrage | SBI Arbitrage | |
|---|---|---|
| UTI - Arbitrage | itself | 31% |
| SBI Arbitrage | 31% | itself |
Most alike: UTI - Arbitrage Fund and SBI Arbitrage Fund share 31% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI - Arbitrage | SBI Arbitrage |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 98% of 109 | 38% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.55% | not measured |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 161% | 98% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Sharma · 8.2 yrs | Ardhendu Bhattacharya · ≥ 3 mo |
| 1-year return | 6.7% | 6.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.4% | 7.3% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.7% | 6.9% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.4% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹11,322 Cr | ₹38,447 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 9.4 yrs | 5.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 150 · 45% | 208 · 41% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.