Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| JM Arbitrage | ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE | |
|---|---|---|
| JM Arbitrage | itself | 51% |
| ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE | 51% | itself |
Most alike: JM Arbitrage Fund and ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE FUND share 51% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | JM Arbitrage | ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE ARBITRAGE |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Arbitrage | Arbitrage |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 109 | 100% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.56% | 0.68% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 148% | 86% |
| Run by P7 | Asit Bhandarkar · 12 yrs | Krina Mehta · ≥ 6 mo |
| 1-year return | 6.4% | 6.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 7.0% | 7.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 6.4% | 6.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −0.5% | −0.5% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹453 Cr | ₹26,997 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 14 yrs | 8.3 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 129 · 36% | 208 · 35% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.