Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Reliance Focused Large Cap | UTI Bluechip Flexicap | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reliance Focused Large CapGrowth | itself | Reliance Focused Large Cap and UTI Bluechip Flexicap share 18% of their portfolios | Reliance Focused Large Cap and Nippon India Small Cap share 4% of their portfolios |
| UTI Bluechip FlexicapGrowth | UTI Bluechip Flexicap and Reliance Focused Large Cap share 18% of their portfolios | itself | UTI Bluechip Flexicap and Nippon India Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Small CapSmall Cap | Nippon India Small Cap and Reliance Focused Large Cap share 4% of their portfolios | Nippon India Small Cap and UTI Bluechip Flexicap share 5% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Reliance Focused Large Cap Fund and UTI Bluechip Flexicap Fund share 18% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Reliance Focused Large Cap | UTI Bluechip Flexicap | Nippon India Small Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Growth | Growth | Small Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 0% of 8 | not measured | 90% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.80% points | not measured | 1.10% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 35% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known | Samir Rachh · 9.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 9.6% | — | 8.9% |
| 3 years p.a. | 10.0% | — | 16.1% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — | 19.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed | −24.2% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹11,819 Cr | ₹2,501 Cr | ₹76,236 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.7 yrs | 2.3 yrs | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 50 · 52% | 57 · 42% | 257 · 16% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.