Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
The largest fund in each of these kinds, to start from — or search above:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Bluechip Flexicap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTI Bluechip FlexicapGrowth | itself | UTI Bluechip Flexicap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 share 0% of their portfolios | UTI Bluechip Flexicap and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 12% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16Growth | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 and UTI Bluechip Flexicap share 0% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap share 0% of their portfolios |
| Parag Parikh Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and UTI Bluechip Flexicap share 12% of their portfolios | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 share 0% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Bluechip Flexicap Fund and Parag Parikh Flexi Cap Fund share 12% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Bluechip Flexicap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 16 | Parag Parikh Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Growth | Growth | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | PPFAS Asset Management Pvt. Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | 63% of 8 | 91% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 0.93% points | 0.84% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 35% | 79% | 29% |
| Run by P7 | not known | Sankaran Naren · 3.6 yrs | Rajeev Thakkar · 13 yrs |
| 1-year return | — | 15.9% | −5.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | 6.2% | 12.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — | 11.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed | −11.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹2,501 Cr | ₹463 Cr | ₹1.46 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 2.3 yrs | 3.3 yrs | 5.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 57 · 42% | 3 · 100% | 116 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.