Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI FLEXICAP | Nippon India Multi Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | itself | SBI FLEXICAP and Nippon India Multi Cap share 25% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap share 29% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Multi CapMulti Cap | Nippon India Multi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 25% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Multi Cap and Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap share 27% of their portfolios |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 29% of their portfolios | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap and Nippon India Multi Cap share 27% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: SBI FLEXICAP FUND and Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap Fund share 29% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI FLEXICAP | Nippon India Multi Cap | Aditya Birla Sun Life Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Multi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 58% of 109 | 50% of 109 | 58% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% points | 0.84% points | 1.02% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 129% | 66% | 50% |
| Run by P7 | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 21 yrs | Dhaval Joshi · ≥ 6 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.1% | −1.4% | 7.3% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 13.5% | 15.0% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.2% | 16.4% | 11.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.0% | −18.6% | −17.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹22,888 Cr | ₹53,760 Cr | ₹27,401 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 14 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 36% | 123 · 29% | 89 · 28% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.