Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Flexi Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI FLEXICAP | Franklin India Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI FLEXICAPFlexi Cap | itself | SBI FLEXICAP and Franklin India Flexi Cap share 30% of their portfolios | SBI FLEXICAP and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios |
| Franklin India Flexi CapFlexi Cap | Franklin India Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 30% of their portfolios | itself | Franklin India Flexi Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 34% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and SBI FLEXICAP share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Franklin India Flexi Cap share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Franklin India Flexi Cap Fund and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap fund share 34% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI FLEXICAP | Franklin India Flexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Franklin Templeton Asset Management (India) Private Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 58% of 109 | 62% of 109 | 96% of 27 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.03% points | 1.00% points | 1.28% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 129% | 55% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Anup Upadhyay · ≥ 3 mo | not known | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.1% | −3.8% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 8.6% | 11.2% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 8.2% | 11.5% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −16.0% | −16.4% | −19.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹22,888 Cr | ₹19,599 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 8.0 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 36% | 60 · 43% | 80 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.