ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • JM Emerging Leaders FundGrowth · no portfolio disclosed×
  • ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4Growth×
  • UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days)Growth×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherJM Emerging LeadersICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days)
JM Emerging LeadersGrowth
itself
JM Emerging Leaders and ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4: no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders
JM Emerging Leaders and UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days): no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders
ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4Growth
ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4 and JM Emerging Leaders: no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders
itself
ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4 and UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days) share 10% of their portfolios
UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days)Growth
UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days) and JM Emerging Leaders: no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders
UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days) and ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4 share 10% of their portfolios
itself

No two of these hold much of the same portfolio. The closest pair, ICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4 and UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days), share 10%. That is a number, not a resemblance: at this level the two funds are doing separate things, and nothing here says whether that is what you wanted.

JM Emerging Leaders has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureJM Emerging LeadersICICI Prudential Bharat Consumption Fund - Series 4UTI - Focussed Equity Fund - Series V (1102 Days)
CategoryGrowthGrowthGrowth
Fund houseJM Financial Asset Management LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company LimitedUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4not measured29% of 7100% of 1
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5not measured0.77% points1.33% points
Portfolio turned over a year P1not measured91%74%
Run by P7not knownnot knownnot known
1-year return—22.1%13.0%
3 years p.a.—16.5%5.4%
5 years p.a.———
Deepest fall (max drawdown)not computednot computednot computed
Assets (AUM)—₹481 Cr₹547 Cr
Disclosed history—3.3 yrs2.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weightnone disclosed20 · 90%24 · 70%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.