Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
2 of 6 chosen
Add another Growth fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | JM Emerging Leaders | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C |
|---|---|---|
| JM Emerging LeadersGrowth | itself | JM Emerging Leaders and Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C: no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders |
| Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series CGrowth | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C and JM Emerging Leaders: no portfolio disclosed for JM Emerging Leaders | itself |
JM Emerging Leaders has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | JM Emerging Leaders | Reliance Capital Builder Fund II - Series C |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Growth | Growth |
| Fund house | JM Financial Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | not measured | not measured |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | not measured | 1.13% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | not measured | 62% |
| Run by P7 | not known | not known |
| 1-year return | — | 7.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | — | — |
| 5 years p.a. | — | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | not computed | not computed |
| Assets (AUM) | — | ₹490 Cr |
| Disclosed history | — | 3.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | none disclosed | 42 · 46% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.