ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

2 of 6 chosen

  • UTI Value FundValue×
  • Mirae Asset Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherUTI ValueMirae Asset Large Cap
UTI ValueValue
itself
UTI Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 49% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and UTI Value share 49% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 49% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureUTI ValueMirae Asset Large Cap
CategoryValueLarge Cap
Fund houseUTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd.Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P437% of 10964% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.79% points1.06% points
Portfolio turned over a year P147%53%
Run by P7Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrsGaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs
1-year return−4.1%−3.3%
3 years p.a.12.1%8.6%
5 years p.a.11.0%7.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.2%−15.8%
Assets (AUM)₹9,603 Cr₹38,599 Cr
Disclosed history12 yrs5.1 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight71 · 41%76 · 48%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.