Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | UTI Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| UTI ValueValue | itself | UTI Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | UTI Value and HDFC Flexi Cap share 39% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and UTI Value share 43% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Flexi Cap share 41% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Flexi CapFlexi Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap and UTI Value share 39% of their portfolios | HDFC Flexi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 41% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: UTI Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | UTI Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | UTI Asset Mgmt. Co. Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 37% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.79% points | 1.01% points | 0.81% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 47% | 57% | 48% |
| Run by P7 | Amit Premchandani · 8.6 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | not known |
| 1-year return | −4.1% | −4.7% | 0.7% |
| 3 years p.a. | 12.1% | 11.1% | 15.8% |
| 5 years p.a. | 11.0% | 12.8% | 16.6% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.2% | −15.4% | −13.3% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹9,603 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹1.13 lakh Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs | 2.4 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 71 · 41% | 69 · 45% | 86 · 44% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.