Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Axis Multicap | Axis Midcap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Axis Multicap share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| Axis MulticapMulti Cap | Axis Multicap and Nippon India Value share 26% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Multicap and Axis Midcap share 41% of their portfolios | Axis Multicap and Tata Value share 17% of their portfolios |
| Axis MidcapMid Cap | Axis Midcap and Nippon India Value share 14% of their portfolios | Axis Midcap and Axis Multicap share 41% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Midcap and Tata Value share 14% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Axis Multicap share 17% of their portfolios | Tata Value and Axis Midcap share 14% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Axis Multicap Fund and Axis Midcap Fund share 41% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Axis Multicap | Axis Midcap | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Multi Cap | Mid Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 100% of 22 | 44% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.45% points | 1.36% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 96% | 80% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | not known | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 9.8% | 6.9% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 20.0% | 17.1% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | — | 13.5% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −18.1% | −19.5% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹9,775 Cr | ₹32,454 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.2 yrs | 5.9 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 114 · 23% | 91 · 30% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.