ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

3 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • Kotak Multi Cap FundMulti Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Axis Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India ValueKotak Multi CapAxis Large Cap
Nippon India ValueValue
itself
Nippon India Value and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Nippon India Value and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios
Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap
Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself
Kotak Multi Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
Axis Large CapLarge Cap
Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and Axis Large Cap Fund share 34% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India ValueKotak Multi CapAxis Large Cap
CategoryValueMulti CapLarge Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd.
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P493% of 109100% of 2447% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.82% points1.62% points1.21% points
Portfolio turned over a year P182%not measured73%
Run by P7Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsnot knownnot known
1-year return−2.8%4.2%−3.2%
3 years p.a.14.0%17.3%9.2%
5 years p.a.13.4%—5.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.6%−21.0%−15.5%
Assets (AUM)₹8,875 Cr₹25,937 Cr₹30,395 Cr
Disclosed history12 yrs—5.9 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight94 · 36%none disclosed49 · 48%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.