Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is the share of money both funds put into the same stocks: for each stock both hold, the smaller of the two weights, added up, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by category name.
5 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Axis Small Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Axis Small Cap share 11% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Bandhan Value share 37% of their portfolios |
| Axis Small CapSmall Cap | Axis Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 11% of their portfolios | itself | Axis Small Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Axis Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios | Axis Small Cap and Bandhan Value share 3% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Mid CapMid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Small Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | Kotak Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund): no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Kotak Mid Cap and Bandhan Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Axis Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | itself | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value share 52% of their portfolios |
| Bandhan ValueValue | Bandhan Value and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Axis Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios | Bandhan Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap | Bandhan Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 52% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Bandhan Value Fund share 52% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.
Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in the data here, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Axis Small Cap | Kotak Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | Bandhan Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Small Cap | Mid Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd. | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Bandhan AMC Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 42% of 109 | 83% of 109 | 68% of 109 | 67% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.44% points | 1.44% points | 0.83% points | 1.17% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 63% | not measured | 58% | 68% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | not known | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs | Daylynn Pinto · ≥ 3.5 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 10.0% | 4.8% | −5.4% | −1.1% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 16.2% | 18.1% | 11.5% | 10.4% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 16.4% | 16.8% | 13.5% | 12.8% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −19.4% | −20.9% | −14.0% | −17.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹27,535 Cr | ₹64,136 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr | ₹10,051 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 5.9 yrs | — | 13 yrs | 4.9 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 132 · 25% | none disclosed | 66 · 52% | 68 · 47% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — comparing across categories is the first mistake the seven checks on each fund page are built to avoid. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.