Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 24% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap share 35% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Flexi CapFlexi Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Value share 24% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap and Nippon India Large Cap share 35% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and Nippon India Large Cap Fund share 42% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Flexi Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Flexi Cap |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 96% of 27 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.01% points | 1.28% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 57% | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | Rajat Chandak · 5.2 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −4.7% | 3.8% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 11.1% | 16.2% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 12.8% | 15.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −15.4% | −19.7% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹25,256 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs | 5.2 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 69 · 45% | 80 · 45% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.