Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 42% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India Large CapLarge Cap | Nippon India Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 42% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Large Cap and HDFC Value share 43% of their portfolios | Nippon India Large Cap and HSBC Value share 31% of their portfolios |
| HDFC ValueValue | HDFC Value and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios | HDFC Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 43% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Value and HSBC Value share 34% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Nippon India Large Cap share 31% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and HDFC Value share 34% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Large Cap Fund and HDFC Value Fund share 43% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | Nippon India Large Cap | HDFC Value | HSBC Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Large Cap | Value | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 73% of 109 | 53% of 109 | 100% of 11 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 1.01% points | 1.07% points | 1.12% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 57% | 54% | 75% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Sailesh Raj Bhan · 19 yrs | not known | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −4.7% | 5.9% | 2.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 11.1% | 16.2% | 15.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 12.8% | 13.9% | — |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −15.4% | −18.2% | −19.6% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹52,344 Cr | ₹8,150 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs | 10 mo | 3.8 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 69 · 45% | 80 · 32% | 86 · 32% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.