Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Value fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | Nippon India Value | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nippon India ValueValue | itself | Nippon India Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 10% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 37% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and Tata Value share 19% of their portfolios |
| HDFC Mid CapMid Cap | HDFC Mid Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios | itself | HDFC Mid Cap and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 4% of their portfolios | HDFC Mid Cap and Tata Value share 7% of their portfolios |
| ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund)Large Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and HDFC Mid Cap share 4% of their portfolios | itself | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) and Tata Value share 24% of their portfolios |
| Tata ValueValue | Tata Value and Nippon India Value share 19% of their portfolios | Tata Value and HDFC Mid Cap share 7% of their portfolios | Tata Value and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 24% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | HDFC Mid Cap | ICICI Prudential Large Cap Fund (erstwhile Bluechip Fund) | Tata Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Mid Cap | Large Cap | Value |
| Fund house | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | Tata Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 66% of 109 | 90% of 109 | 63% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% points | 0.92% points | 0.81% points | 1.15% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 38% | 45% | 81% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | not known | Vaibhav Dusad · 5.7 yrs | Sonam Udasi · ≥ 9 mo |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | 6.6% | −5.3% | 0.2% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 17.6% | 10.6% | 12.9% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 18.9% | 10.9% | 13.3% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −16.8% | −15.4% | −20.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹1.07 lakh Cr | ₹80,822 Cr | ₹8,440 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 10 mo | 13 yrs | 11 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 81 · 37% | 93 · 47% | 41 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.