ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • Kotak Mid Cap FundMid Cap · no portfolio disclosed×
  • Axis Large Cap FundLarge Cap×
  • Mirae Asset Large Cap FundLarge Cap×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India ValueKotak Mid CapAxis Large CapMirae Asset Large Cap
Nippon India ValueValue
itself
Nippon India Value and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Nippon India Value and Axis Large Cap share 34% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 45% of their portfolios
Kotak Mid CapMid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Nippon India Value: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Kotak Mid Cap and Axis Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Kotak Mid Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Axis Large CapLarge Cap
Axis Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 34% of their portfolios
Axis Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
itself
Axis Large Cap and Mirae Asset Large Cap share 58% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large CapLarge Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Nippon India Value share 45% of their portfolios
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Kotak Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Mid Cap
Mirae Asset Large Cap and Axis Large Cap share 58% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Axis Large Cap Fund and Mirae Asset Large Cap Fund share 58% of their portfolios. Holding both is closer to holding one twice than to diversifying.

Kotak Mid Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India ValueKotak Mid CapAxis Large CapMirae Asset Large Cap
CategoryValueMid CapLarge CapLarge Cap
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management LimitedKotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited.Axis Asset Management Co. Ltd.Mirae Asset Investment Managers (India) Pvt. Ltd
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P493% of 10983% of 10947% of 10964% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.82% points1.44% points1.21% points1.06% points
Portfolio turned over a year P182%not measured73%53%
Run by P7Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsnot knownnot knownGaurav Misra · 7.7 yrs
1-year return−2.8%4.8%−3.2%−3.3%
3 years p.a.14.0%18.1%9.2%8.6%
5 years p.a.13.4%16.8%5.8%7.8%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.6%−20.9%−15.5%−15.8%
Assets (AUM)₹8,875 Cr₹64,136 Cr₹30,395 Cr₹38,599 Cr
Disclosed history12 yrs—5.9 yrs5.1 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight94 · 36%none disclosed49 · 48%76 · 48%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.