Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures.
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| Nippon India Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon India Value | itself | 37% |
| ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) | 37% | itself |
Most alike: Nippon India Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios. Two funds this different are doing different things; whether that is what you want is a separate question.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | Nippon India Value | ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Value | Value |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 93% of 109 | 68% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 0.82% | 0.83% |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 82% | 58% |
| Run by P7 | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Dharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs |
| 1-year return | −2.8% | −5.4% |
| 3 years p.a. | 14.0% | 11.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.4% | 13.5% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.6% | −14.0% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹60,800 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 12 yrs | 13 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 94 · 36% | 66 · 52% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.