ANVESHAN Create account

Compare

Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.

4 of 6 chosen

  • Nippon India Value FundValue×
  • Quant Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • BANDHAN Small Cap FundSmall Cap×
  • ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value×

Overlap

share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common

each fundagainst each otherNippon India ValueQuant Small CapBANDHAN Small CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)
Nippon India ValueValue
itself
Nippon India Value and Quant Small Cap share 5% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and BANDHAN Small Cap share 10% of their portfolios
Nippon India Value and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios
Quant Small CapSmall Cap
Quant Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 5% of their portfolios
itself
Quant Small Cap and BANDHAN Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
Quant Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 3% of their portfolios
BANDHAN Small CapSmall Cap
BANDHAN Small Cap and Nippon India Value share 10% of their portfolios
BANDHAN Small Cap and Quant Small Cap share 9% of their portfolios
itself
BANDHAN Small Cap and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 7% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)Value
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Nippon India Value share 37% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and Quant Small Cap share 3% of their portfolios
ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) and BANDHAN Small Cap share 7% of their portfolios
itself

Closest pair: Nippon India Value Fund and ICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund) share 37% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.

Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.

Side by side

record, cost, returns, drawdown, size

MeasureNippon India ValueQuant Small CapBANDHAN Small CapICICI Prudential Value Fund (erstwhile Value Discovery Fund)
CategoryValueSmall CapSmall CapValue
Fund houseNippon Life India Asset Management Limitedquant Money Managers LimitedBandhan AMC LimitedICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited
Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P493% of 10969% of 10975% of 4468% of 109
Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P50.82% points0.84% points2.00% points0.83% points
Portfolio turned over a year P182%75%68%58%
Run by P7Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrsAnkit Pande · ≥ 2.5 yrsKirthi Jain · ≥ 2.8 yrsDharmesh Kakkad · 5.7 yrs
1-year return−2.8%12.7%10.4%−5.4%
3 years p.a.14.0%18.5%25.3%11.5%
5 years p.a.13.4%19.2%20.0%13.5%
Deepest fall (max drawdown)−17.6%−24.4%−22.8%−14.0%
Assets (AUM)₹8,875 Cr₹34,069 Cr₹31,103 Cr₹60,800 Cr
Disclosed history12 yrs7.5 yrs4.3 yrs13 yrs
Holdings · top ten weight94 · 36%120 · 43%265 · 30%66 · 52%

Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.