Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
4 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MIDCAP | HSBC Value | Nippon India Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | itself | SBI MIDCAP and HSBC Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Value share 8% of their portfolios | SBI MIDCAP and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 5% of their portfolios |
| HSBC ValueValue | HSBC Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | itself | HSBC Value and Nippon India Value share 28% of their portfolios | HSBC Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 4% of their portfolios |
| Nippon India ValueValue | Nippon India Value and SBI MIDCAP share 8% of their portfolios | Nippon India Value and HSBC Value share 28% of their portfolios | itself | Nippon India Value and Motilal Oswal Midcap share 3% of their portfolios |
| Motilal Oswal MidcapMid Cap | Motilal Oswal Midcap and SBI MIDCAP share 5% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and HSBC Value share 4% of their portfolios | Motilal Oswal Midcap and Nippon India Value share 3% of their portfolios | itself |
Closest pair: HSBC Value Fund and Nippon India Value Fund share 28% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MIDCAP | HSBC Value | Nippon India Value | Motilal Oswal Midcap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Value | Value | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | HSBC Asset Management (India) Private Ltd. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 100% of 11 | 93% of 109 | 54% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 1.12% points | 0.82% points | 1.37% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | 75% | 82% | 92% |
| Run by P7 | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | Venugopal Manghat · 14 yrs | Meenakshi Dawar · 8.3 yrs | Rakesh Shetty · 3.8 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.8% | 2.4% | −2.8% | −0.5% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.0% | 15.9% | 14.0% | 19.5% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | — | 13.4% | 21.1% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −19.6% | −17.6% | −28.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹15,373 Cr | ₹8,875 Cr | ₹41,706 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | 3.8 yrs | 12 yrs | 4.0 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 64 · 28% | 86 · 32% | 94 · 36% | 32 · 54% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.