Compare
Up to six funds side by side, and how much of each is the same portfolio as the others. Overlap is Σ min(weight) over the stocks both hold, from the latest disclosures. All 6,937 schemes are searchable — by scheme name, by fund house, or by the category you know them as.
3 of 6 chosen
Add another Mid Cap fund — overlap says most about funds of one kind:
Overlap
share of the portfolio the two funds hold in common
| each fundagainst each other | SBI MIDCAP | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| SBI MIDCAPMid Cap | itself | SBI MIDCAP and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | SBI MIDCAP and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap share 26% of their portfolios |
| Kotak Multi CapMulti Cap | Kotak Multi Cap and SBI MIDCAP: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself | Kotak Multi Cap and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap |
| Nippon India Growth Mid CapMid Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and SBI MIDCAP share 26% of their portfolios | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap and Kotak Multi Cap: no portfolio disclosed for Kotak Multi Cap | itself |
Closest pair: SBI MIDCAP FUND and Nippon India Growth Mid Cap Fund share 26% of their portfolios. Most of what each of them holds, the other does not; whether two funds this far apart belong in one portfolio is a separate question.
Kotak Multi Cap has no portfolio on file, so its row is blank rather than zero — that is an absence in our data, not a finding about the fund.
Read a cell as: of everything the two funds hold, this much is the same holding at the same weight. It is symmetric — the pair above the diagonal and the pair below it are one number shown twice. A pair at 0% holds nothing in common, which is a real answer, and often the useful one.
Side by side
record, cost, returns, drawdown, size
| Measure | SBI MIDCAP | Kotak Multi Cap | Nippon India Growth Mid Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mid Cap | Multi Cap | Mid Cap |
| Fund house | SBI Funds Management Limited | Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited. | Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited |
| Share of three-year stretches it beat its category P4 | 38% of 109 | 100% of 24 | 87% of 109 |
| Regular plan costs more than Direct by, a year P5 | 1.09% points | 1.62% points | 0.86% points |
| Portfolio turned over a year P1 | 80% | not measured | 52% |
| Run by P7 | Bhavin Vithlani · ≥ 3 mo | not known | Rupesh Patel · 3.6 yrs |
| 1-year return | 3.8% | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| 3 years p.a. | 11.0% | 17.3% | 18.6% |
| 5 years p.a. | 13.5% | — | 18.0% |
| Deepest fall (max drawdown) | −17.9% | −21.0% | −19.9% |
| Assets (AUM) | ₹24,349 Cr | ₹25,937 Cr | ₹48,143 Cr |
| Disclosed history | 5.8 yrs | — | 14 yrs |
| Holdings · top ten weight | 64 · 28% | none disclosed | 105 · 25% |
Funds in different categories are not comparable on returns — a category error is the first thing the postulates refuse to make. Compare each to its own category on its fund page.